Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 596.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 9.2 GH/s |
| 1,050 W | Power Consumption | 3,425 W |
| 1,761,745.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 373,908.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,600.0 kg | Weight | 15,000.0 kg |
| 3,583 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,686 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1437% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 1437% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) 69% better power draw (1,050 vs 3,425 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 79% better efficiency (1,761,745 vs 373,908 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) 69% better weight (4,600 vs 15,000 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 226% more heat output (3,583 vs 11,686 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,599 |
| -$2.52 | Daily net profit | -$8.22 |
| -$2,110 | Net after 1 year | -$4,599 |
| -$3,030 | Net after 2 years | -$7,599 |
| -$3,949 | Net after 3 years | -$10,600 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)373,908.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) is more profitable at $-2.52/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) runs at 1,761,745.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) runs at 373,908.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,387,836.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (1,761,745 vs 373,908 J/TH).