Antminer L7 vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer L7 | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 9,050.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 800.0 MH/s |
| 3,425 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 378,453.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer L7
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer L7 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1031% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer L7 and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer L7 1031% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 85% better power draw (3,425 vs 500 W)
- Antminer L7 39% better efficiency (378,453 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 78% better weight (14.4 vs 3.2 kg)
- Antminer L7 585% more heat output (11,686 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer L7 | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $4,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$7,500 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$10,500 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$13,501 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer L7378,453.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer L7 vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Antminer L7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer L7 vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer L7 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer L7 or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer L7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer L7 and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Antminer L7 runs at 378,453.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 246,547.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficiency (378,453 vs 625,000 J/TH).