Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer S7-LN
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S7-LN |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.7 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 697 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 258.2 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,378 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer S7-LN
Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9), which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 419% more hashrate (14.0 vs 2.7 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer S7-LN diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 419% more hashrate (14.0 vs 2.7 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 48% better power draw (1,350 vs 697 W)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 63% better efficiency (96.4 vs 258.2 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better weight (6.0 vs 7,500.0 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 94% more heat output (4,606 vs 2,378 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 97% more home mining score (59.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S7-LN |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$1.58 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$575 |
| -$2,347 | Net after 2 years | -$1,150 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$1,725 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)96.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer S7-LN more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN is more profitable at $-1.58/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer S7-LN?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer S7-LN: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN runs at 258.2 J/TH — a difference of 161.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (96.4 vs 258.2 J/TH).