Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 151.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 3,247 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,079 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP
Based on BTC price of $77,862 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 979% more hashrate (14.0 vs 151.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP's favour. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP 979% more hashrate (14.0 vs 151.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 58% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,247 W)
- Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP 78% better efficiency (96.4 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP 141% more heat output (4,606 vs 11,079 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 168% more home mining score (59.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$2.38 |
| -$1,349 | Net after 1 year | -$1,869 |
| -$2,348 | Net after 2 years | -$2,738 |
| -$3,348 | Net after 3 years | -$3,608 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP is more profitable at $-2.38/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 74.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficiency (96.4 vs 21.5 J/TH).