Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Specification | Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 62.0 TH/s |
| 2,385 W | Power Consumption | 3,286 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 53.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 8,138 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,212 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bolon Miner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,048 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 27% better power draw (2,385 vs 3,286 W). That said, the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) 17% more hashrate (53.0 vs 62.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 27% better power draw (2,385 vs 3,286 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 15% better efficiency (45.0 vs 53.0 J/TH)
- Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) 38% more heat output (8,138 vs 11,212 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Metric | Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $274 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.82 | Daily net profit | -$5.66 |
| -$1,668 | Net after 1 year | -$2,066 |
| -$3,063 | Net after 2 years | -$4,131 |
| -$4,457 | Net after 3 years | -$6,197 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.82/day compared to $-5.66/day for the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bolon Miner B11 (62Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) runs at 53.0 J/TH — a difference of 8.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (45.0 vs 53.0 J/TH).