Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 115.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Power Consumption | 3,500 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.4 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 11,000.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Based on BTC price of $79,027 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 58% more hashrate (73.0 vs 115.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 58% more hashrate (73.0 vs 115.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 17% better power draw (2,920 vs 3,500 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 24% better efficiency (40.0 vs 30.4 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 100% better weight (11,000.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 20% more heat output (9,963 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| $550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $609 |
| -$4.35 | Daily net profit | -$4.22 |
| -$2,139 | Net after 1 year | -$2,148 |
| -$3,728 | Net after 2 years | -$3,688 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 3 years | -$5,227 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner A132630.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 is more profitable at $-4.22/day compared to $-4.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?
The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?
The Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 9.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficiency (40.0 vs 30.4 J/TH).