Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 920.0 TH/s |
| 2,094 W | Power Consumption | 13,340 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 37.0 kg |
| 7,145 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 45,516 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)
MicroBT WhatsMiner M79
Based on BTC price of $79,248 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 1636% more hashrate (53.0 vs 920.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 1636% more hashrate (53.0 vs 920.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 84% better power draw (2,094 vs 13,340 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 63% better efficiency (39.5 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 37.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 537% more heat output (7,145 vs 45,516 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 69% more home mining score (26.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 |
|---|---|---|
| $780 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.03 | Daily net profit | $2.58 |
| -$1,887 | Net after 1 year | +$943 |
| -$2,994 | Net after 2 years | +$1,885 |
| -$4,101 | Net after 3 years | +$2,828 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M79$5.61/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M79Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7914.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is more profitable at $2.58/day compared to $-3.03/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M79?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (39.5 vs 14.5 J/TH).