Antminer S17 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 95.0 TH/s |
| 2,212 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 14,500.0 kg |
| 7,547 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) wins on 2 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 70% more hashrate (56.0 vs 95.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer S17 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S17 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 70% more hashrate (56.0 vs 95.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 Pro 32% better power draw (2,212 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 13% better efficiency (39.5 vs 34.2 J/TH)
- Antminer S17 Pro 100% better weight (9.5 vs 14,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 47% more heat output (7,547 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 Pro 282% more home mining score (84.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S17 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $215 |
| -$3.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.34 |
| -$1,194 | Net after 1 year | -$1,801 |
| -$2,388 | Net after 2 years | -$3,386 |
| -$3,582 | Net after 3 years | -$4,972 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17 ProScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 Pro is more profitable at $-3.27/day compared to $-4.34/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S17 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S17 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)?
The Antminer S17 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S17 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH — a difference of 5.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (39.5 vs 34.2 J/TH).