Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S19

Antminer S19

Hashrate 95.0 TH/s Power 3,250 W Efficiency 34.2 J/TH
VS
GMO miner B2

GMO miner B2

Hashrate 24.0 TH/s Power 1,950 W Efficiency 81.3 J/TH

Antminer S19 vs GMO miner B2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19 Specification GMO miner B2
95.0 TH/s Hashrate 24.0 TH/s
3,250 W Power Consumption 1,950 W
34.2 J/TH Efficiency 81.3 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
14.4 kg Weight
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,653 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer GMO miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19

Daily Revenue 0.00004372 BTC $3.42
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$4.38
Monthly -$131.46
Yearly -$1,599.45

GMO miner B2

Daily Revenue 0.00001104 BTC $0.86
Daily Electricity -$4.68
Daily Profit -$3.82
Monthly -$114.50
Yearly -$1,393.03

Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 296% more hashrate (95.0 vs 24.0 TH/s). The GMO miner B2 holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer S19 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 and GMO miner B2 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer S19 296% more hashrate (95.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
  • GMO miner B2 40% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,950 W)
  • Antminer S19 58% better efficiency (34.2 vs 81.3 J/TH)
  • Antminer S19 67% more heat output (11,089 vs 6,653 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S19 200% more home mining score (84.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer S19 Metric GMO miner B2
$2,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$4.38 Daily net profit -$3.82
-$3,599 Net after 1 year -$1,393
-$5,199 Net after 2 years -$2,786
-$6,798 Net after 3 years -$4,179
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S19

34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer S19 or the GMO miner B2?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the GMO miner B2 is more profitable at $-3.82/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Antminer S19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S19 or the GMO miner B2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer S19 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the GMO miner B2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer S19 vs GMO miner B2: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer S19 vs GMO miner B2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer S19 runs at 34.2 J/TH while the GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH — a difference of 47.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (34.2 vs 81.3 J/TH).