Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S19 XP

Antminer S19 XP

Hashrate 140.0 TH/s Power 3,010 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Antminer S19k Pro

Antminer S19k Pro

Hashrate 120.0 TH/s Power 2,760 W Efficiency 23.0 J/TH

Antminer S19 XP vs Antminer S19k Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19 XP Specification Antminer S19k Pro
140.0 TH/s Hashrate 120.0 TH/s
3,010 W Power Consumption 2,760 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 23.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.4 kg Weight 12.5 kg
10,270 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,417 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 84/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19 XP

Daily Revenue 0.00006644 BTC $5.26
Daily Electricity -$7.22
Daily Profit -$1.96
Monthly -$58.91
Yearly -$716.79

Antminer S19k Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00005695 BTC $4.51
Daily Electricity -$6.62
Daily Profit -$2.12
Monthly -$63.46
Yearly -$772.07

Based on BTC price of $79,176 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S19 XP, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 17% more hashrate (140 vs 120 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 XP's favour. The Antminer S19k Pro claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer S19 XP — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer S19 XP and Antminer S19k Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer S19 XP 17% more hashrate (140 vs 120 TH/s)
  • Antminer S19k Pro 8% better power draw (3,010 vs 2,760 W)
  • Antminer S19 XP 7% better efficiency (21.5 vs 23.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer S19k Pro 13% better weight (14.4 vs 12.5 kg)
  • Antminer S19 XP 9% more heat output (10,270 vs 9,417 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer S19 XP Metric Antminer S19k Pro
$4,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,800
-$1.96 Daily net profit -$2.12
-$5,217 Net after 1 year -$3,572
-$5,934 Net after 2 years -$4,344
-$6,650 Net after 3 years -$5,116
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S19 XP

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer S19 XP or Antminer S19k Pro more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP is more profitable at $-1.96/day compared to $-2.12/day for the Antminer S19k Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 XP or Antminer S19k Pro?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19 XP or Antminer S19k Pro?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Antminer S19 XP and Antminer S19k Pro on J/TH?

The Antminer S19 XP runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Antminer S19k Pro runs at 23.0 J/TH — a difference of 1.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (21.5 vs 23.0 J/TH).