Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs GMO miner B3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Specification | GMO miner B3 |
|---|---|---|
| 332.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 5,644 W | Power Consumption | 3,417 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 103.6 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 5,000.0 kg |
| 19,257 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,659 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | GMO miner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
GMO miner B3
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th), which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 906% more hashrate (332.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). The GMO miner B3 holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and GMO miner B3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 906% more hashrate (332.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- GMO miner B3 39% better power draw (5,644 vs 3,417 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 84% better efficiency (17.0 vs 103.6 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 100% better weight (12.8 vs 5,000.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 65% more heat output (19,257 vs 11,659 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 100% more home mining score (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Metric | GMO miner B3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.47 | Daily net profit | -$7.00 |
| -$2,335 | Net after 1 year | -$2,555 |
| -$2,871 | Net after 2 years | -$5,110 |
| -$3,407 | Net after 3 years | -$7,665 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)Score: 44/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or GMO miner B3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is more profitable at $-1.47/day compared to $-7.00/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs GMO miner B3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the GMO miner B3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs GMO miner B3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the GMO miner B3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and GMO miner B3?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH — a difference of 86.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (17.0 vs 103.6 J/TH).