Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 5,510 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 18,800 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $79,115 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 7150% more hashrate (580.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd's favour. That said, the NerdOctaxe Gamma isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and NerdOctaxe Gamma diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 7150% more hashrate (580.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 96% better power draw (5,510 vs 200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 62% better efficiency (9.5 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 94% better weight (13.5 vs 0.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 2655% more heat output (18,800 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 103% more home mining score (30.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $12,995 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| $7.89 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$10,114 | Net after 1 year | -$668 |
| -$7,234 | Net after 2 years | -$737 |
| -$4,353 | Net after 3 years | -$806 |
| Takes ~4.5 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd$8.08/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or NerdOctaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is more profitable at $7.89/day compared to $-0.19/day for the NerdOctaxe Gamma. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or the NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd runs at 9.5 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 15.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (9.5 vs 25.0 J/TH).