Bitmain Antminer S23 vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 318.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,498 W | Power Consumption | 1,432 W |
| 11.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 11,935 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,886 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S23 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 2929% more hashrate (318.0 vs 10.5 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S23 and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 2929% more hashrate (318.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 59% better power draw (3,498 vs 1,432 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 92% better efficiency (11.0 vs 136.4 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 100% better weight (14.5 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 144% more heat output (11,935 vs 4,886 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $4,999 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| $3.17 | Daily net profit | -$3.05 |
| -$3,842 | Net after 1 year | -$2,070 |
| -$2,686 | Net after 2 years | -$3,185 |
| -$1,529 | Net after 3 years | -$4,300 |
| Takes ~4.3 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23$6.22/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S2311.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S23 or the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 is more profitable at $3.17/day compared to $-3.05/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S23 vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S23 or the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S23 vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 runs at 11.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH — a difference of 125.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficiency (11.0 vs 136.4 J/TH).