Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 1,280 W Efficiency 80.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Hashrate 57.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 57.9 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) Specification Innosilicon T3+ 57T
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 57.0 TH/s
1,280 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
80.0 J/TH Efficiency 57.9 J/TH
Noise Level
4,560.0 kg Weight 10,380.0 kg
4,367 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$3.07
Daily Profit -$2.49
Monthly -$74.70
Yearly -$908.91

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Daily Revenue 0.00002623 BTC $2.07
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$5.85
Monthly -$175.42
Yearly -$2,134.23

Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Innosilicon T3+ 57T wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 256% more hashrate (16.0 vs 57.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon T3+ 57T's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T3+ 57T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Innosilicon T3+ 57T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 256% more hashrate (16.0 vs 57.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 61% better power draw (1,280 vs 3,300 W)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 28% better efficiency (80.0 vs 57.9 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 56% better weight (4,560 vs 10,380 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 158% more heat output (4,367 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) Metric Innosilicon T3+ 57T
Upfront cost (MSRP) $550
-$2.49 Daily net profit -$5.85
-$909 Net after 1 year -$2,684
-$1,818 Net after 2 years -$4,818
-$2,727 Net after 3 years -$6,953
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

57.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Innosilicon T3+ 57T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-5.85/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 57T runs at 57.9 J/TH — a difference of 22.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 28% better efficiency (80.0 vs 57.9 J/TH).