Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)

Hashrate 13.0 TH/s Power 1,280 W Efficiency 98.5 J/TH
VS
Pantech SX6

Pantech SX6

Hashrate 8.5 TH/s Power 1,000 W Efficiency 117.7 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) vs Pantech SX6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) Specification Pantech SX6
13.0 TH/s Hashrate 8.5 TH/s
1,280 W Power Consumption 1,000 W
98.5 J/TH Efficiency 117.7 J/TH
Noise Level
4,200.0 kg Weight 3,000.0 kg
4,367 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,412 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Pantech

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000617 BTC $0.49
Daily Electricity -$3.07
Daily Profit -$2.58
Monthly -$77.50
Yearly -$942.86

Pantech SX6

Daily Revenue 0.00000403 BTC $0.32
Daily Electricity -$2.40
Daily Profit -$2.08
Monthly -$62.41
Yearly -$759.34

Based on BTC price of $79,235 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) wins on 2 of 3 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 53% more hashrate (13.0 vs 8.5 TH/s). That said, the Pantech SX6 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) and Pantech SX6 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 53% more hashrate (13.0 vs 8.5 TH/s)
  • Pantech SX6 22% better power draw (1,280 vs 1,000 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 16% better efficiency (98.5 vs 117.7 J/TH)
  • Pantech SX6 29% better weight (4,200 vs 3,000 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 28% more heat output (4,367 vs 3,412 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) Metric Pantech SX6
$65 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.58 Daily net profit -$2.08
-$1,008 Net after 1 year -$759
-$1,951 Net after 2 years -$1,519
-$2,894 Net after 3 years -$2,278
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)

98.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) vs Pantech SX6: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Pantech SX6 is more profitable at $-2.08/day compared to $-2.58/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) or Pantech SX6?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) or the Pantech SX6?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) and Pantech SX6 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) runs at 98.5 J/TH while the Pantech SX6 runs at 117.7 J/TH — a difference of 19.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (98.5 vs 117.7 J/TH).