Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 37.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,380 W |
| 93.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 155% more hashrate (14.5 vs 37.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 155% more hashrate (14.5 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 43% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,380 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 31% better efficiency (93.1 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 45% better weight (4,200 vs 7,600 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 76% more heat output (4,606 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.71 | Daily net profit | -$4.37 |
| -$1,055 | Net after 1 year | -$1,594 |
| -$2,045 | Net after 2 years | -$3,188 |
| -$3,035 | Net after 3 years | -$4,781 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner 104764.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.71/day compared to $-4.37/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) runs at 93.1 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 28.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficiency (93.1 vs 64.3 J/TH).