Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AI3680 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 375.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 5,625 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,193 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Based on BTC price of $77,703 and current network difficulty as of Apr 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Auradine Teraflux AI3680$3.01/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)Score: 42/100. 70 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Antminer Slim Edition (S17) with...
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Gamma
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe GT
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Hex
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17
