Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs iPollo B1L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Specification | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 58.0 TH/s |
| 1,541 W | Power Consumption | 3,000 W |
| 67.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 51.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 12,700.0 kg |
| 5,258 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
iPollo B1L
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo B1L, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 152% more hashrate (23.0 vs 58.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) and iPollo B1L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo B1L 152% more hashrate (23.0 vs 58.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 49% better power draw (1,541 vs 3,000 W)
- iPollo B1L 23% better efficiency (67.0 vs 51.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 48% better weight (6,600 vs 12,700 kg)
- iPollo B1L 95% more heat output (5,258 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 27% more home mining score (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Metric | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$2.86 | Daily net profit | -$5.09 |
| -$1,044 | Net after 1 year | -$2,287 |
| -$2,088 | Net after 2 years | -$4,144 |
| -$3,133 | Net after 3 years | -$6,001 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo B1L51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or the iPollo B1L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) is more profitable at $-2.86/day compared to $-5.09/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or the iPollo B1L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or iPollo B1L?
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs iPollo B1L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 15.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficiency (67.0 vs 51.7 J/TH).