Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Hashrate 600.0 TH/s Power 8,700 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Avalon A1566

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 Specification Avalon A1566
600.0 TH/s Hashrate 185.0 TH/s
8,700 W Power Consumption 3,420 W
14.5 J/TH Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
60 dB Noise Level 75 dB
Weight 14.9 kg
29,684 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,669 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Daily Revenue 0.00027611 BTC $21.49
Daily Electricity -$20.88
Daily Profit $0.61
Monthly $18.29
Yearly $222.52

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008513 BTC $6.63
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.58
Monthly -$47.46
Yearly -$577.44

Based on BTC price of $77,830 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 224% more hashrate (600 vs 185 TH/s). The Avalon A1566 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AH3880 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and Avalon A1566 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 224% more hashrate (600 vs 185 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1566 61% better power draw (8,700 vs 3,420 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 22% better efficiency (14.5 vs 18.5 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 154% more heat output (29,684 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 Metric Avalon A1566
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,500
$0.61 Daily net profit -$1.58
+$223 Net after 1 year -$6,077
+$445 Net after 2 years -$6,655
+$668 Net after 3 years -$7,232
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

$2.19/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1566

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or Avalon A1566 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is more profitable at $0.61/day compared to $-1.58/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or the Avalon A1566 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Avalon A1566 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Avalon A1566: which fits a residential setup better?

The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Avalon A1566: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH while the Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 4.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficiency (14.5 vs 18.5 J/TH).