Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Hashrate 260.0 TH/s Power 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+

Hashrate 570.0 TH/s Power 7,125 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+
260.0 TH/s Hashrate 570.0 TH/s
4,420 W Power Consumption 7,125 W
17.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
Weight 29.5 kg
15,081 BTU/hr BTU Output 24,311 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00011965 BTC $9.46
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$1.15
Monthly -$34.56
Yearly -$420.48

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+

Daily Revenue 0.00026230 BTC $20.73
Daily Electricity -$17.10
Daily Profit $3.63
Monthly $108.91
Yearly $1,325.11

Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 119% more hashrate (260 vs 570 TH/s). The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ 119% more hashrate (260 vs 570 TH/s)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 38% better power draw (4,420 vs 7,125 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ 26% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ 61% more heat output (15,081 vs 24,311 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+

$4.78/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ is more profitable at $3.63/day compared to $-1.15/day for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+: which fits a residential setup better?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 4.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficiency (17.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).