Avalon A1346 vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 42 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe GT comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 98% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 75.0 W). That said, the Avalon A1346 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1346 and Bitaxe GT sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1346 2100% more hashrate (110.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 98% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 50% better efficiency (30.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 44% better noise (75.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- Bitaxe GT 97% better weight (12.3 vs 0.4 kg)
- Avalon A1346 4300% more heat output (11,260 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 78% more home mining score (36.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$3.91 | Daily net profit | $0.00 |
| -$4,229 | Net after 1 year | -$498 |
| -$5,657 | Net after 2 years | -$497 |
| -$7,086 | Net after 3 years | -$497 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~650.6 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitaxe GT$3.92/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1346 or the Bitaxe GT?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.91/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1346 or Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Avalon A1346 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1346). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1346 and Bitaxe GT on J/TH?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 15.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (30.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).