Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs Bitfily Snow Panther B1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U | Specification | Bitfily Snow Panther B1 |
|---|---|---|
| 480.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 16.0 TH/s |
| 8,046 W | Power Consumption | 1,380 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 86.3 J/TH |
| 80 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 20.0 kg | Weight | 4,500.0 kg |
| 27,453 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,709 BTU/hr |
| 23/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Bitfily |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U
Bitfily Snow Panther B1
Based on BTC price of $77,862 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 2900% more hashrate (480.0 vs 16.0 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U's favour. The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U and Bitfily Snow Panther B1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 2900% more hashrate (480.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Bitfily Snow Panther B1 83% better power draw (8,046 vs 1,380 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 81% better efficiency (16.8 vs 86.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 100% better weight (20.0 vs 4,500.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 483% more heat output (27,453 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
- Bitfily Snow Panther B1 35% more home mining score (23.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U | Metric | Bitfily Snow Panther B1 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,568 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.11 | Daily net profit | -$2.74 |
| -$6,339 | Net after 1 year | -$1,000 |
| -$7,109 | Net after 2 years | -$1,999 |
| -$7,880 | Net after 3 years | -$2,999 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitfily Snow Panther B1Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U or Bitfily Snow Panther B1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U is more profitable at $-2.11/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Bitfily Snow Panther B1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs Bitfily Snow Panther B1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U or the Bitfily Snow Panther B1?
The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 23/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs Bitfily Snow Panther B1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U runs at 16.8 J/TH while the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 runs at 86.3 J/TH — a difference of 69.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (16.8 vs 86.3 J/TH).