Canaan Avalon A1566HA vs FluMiner T3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA | Specification | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| 460.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 115.0 TH/s |
| 8,188 W | Power Consumption | 1,700 W |
| 17.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.8 J/TH |
| 80 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 20.0 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 27,938 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 23/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A1566HA
FluMiner T3
Based on BTC price of $79,084 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the FluMiner T3 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 79% better power draw (8,188 vs 1,700 W) in the FluMiner T3's favour. That said, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA and FluMiner T3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 300% more hashrate (460 vs 115 TH/s)
- FluMiner T3 79% better power draw (8,188 vs 1,700 W)
- FluMiner T3 17% better efficiency (17.8 vs 14.8 J/TH)
- FluMiner T3 38% better noise (80.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- FluMiner T3 37% better weight (20.0 vs 12.6 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 382% more heat output (27,938 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner T3 143% more home mining score (23.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA | Metric | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,074 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,601 |
| -$2.91 | Daily net profit | $0.11 |
| -$6,136 | Net after 1 year | -$1,562 |
| -$7,199 | Net after 2 years | -$1,524 |
| -$8,261 | Net after 3 years | -$1,486 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~41.7 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
FluMiner T3$3.02/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner T3Score: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner T314.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA or the FluMiner T3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner T3 is more profitable at $0.11/day compared to $-2.91/day for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon A1566HA or the FluMiner T3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The FluMiner T3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A1566HA at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA or FluMiner T3?
The FluMiner T3 scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 23/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan Avalon A1566HA vs FluMiner T3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA runs at 17.8 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 3.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (17.8 vs 14.8 J/TH).