Canaan Avalon A1566I vs StrongU Hornbill H8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A1566I | Specification | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| 249.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 74.0 TH/s |
| 4,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,330 W |
| 18.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 11.3 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 15,354 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,362 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A1566I
StrongU Hornbill H8
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan Avalon A1566I wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 236% more hashrate (249.0 vs 74.0 TH/s). That said, the StrongU Hornbill H8 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A1566I and StrongU Hornbill H8 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 236% more hashrate (249.0 vs 74.0 TH/s)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 26% better power draw (4,500 vs 3,330 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 60% better efficiency (18.1 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 100% better weight (11.3 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 35% more heat output (15,354 vs 11,362 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 100% more home mining score (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A1566I | Metric | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,710 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$1.74 | Daily net profit | -$5.30 |
| -$3,347 | Net after 1 year | -$3,135 |
| -$3,983 | Net after 2 years | -$5,069 |
| -$4,620 | Net after 3 years | -$7,004 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566IScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566I18.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon A1566I or StrongU Hornbill H8 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566I is more profitable at $-1.74/day compared to $-5.30/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A1566I vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I is quieter at 50 dB compared to the StrongU Hornbill H8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A1566I or StrongU Hornbill H8?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A1566I and StrongU Hornbill H8 on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I runs at 18.1 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 26.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (18.1 vs 45.0 J/TH).