Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3S | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 37.0 TH/s |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 2,380 W |
| 23.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| 30 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.9 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 478 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $79,123 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 94% better power draw (140 vs 2,380 W) in the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S's favour. That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 517% more hashrate (6.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 94% better power draw (140 vs 2,380 W)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 64% better efficiency (23.3 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 100% better weight (0.9 vs 7,600.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 1600% more heat output (478 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 150% more home mining score (65.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3S | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $145 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.12 | Daily net profit | -$4.36 |
| -$188 | Net after 1 year | -$1,593 |
| -$231 | Net after 2 years | -$3,186 |
| -$274 | Net after 3 years | -$4,779 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-4.36/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 41.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (23.3 vs 64.3 J/TH).