Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs Whatsminer M30S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 841 | Specification | Whatsminer M30S |
|---|---|---|
| 13.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 88.0 TH/s |
| 1,290 W | Power Consumption | 3,344 W |
| 94.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,700.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 4,402 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,410 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 841
Whatsminer M30S
Based on BTC price of $77,866 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M30S comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 547% more hashrate (13.6 vs 88.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M30S's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 and Whatsminer M30S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M30S 547% more hashrate (13.6 vs 88.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 61% better power draw (1,290 vs 3,344 W)
- Whatsminer M30S 60% better efficiency (94.9 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S 100% better weight (4,700.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S 159% more heat output (4,402 vs 11,410 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S 16% more home mining score (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 841 | Metric | Whatsminer M30S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,500 |
| -$2.61 | Daily net profit | -$4.87 |
| -$952 | Net after 1 year | -$3,278 |
| -$1,904 | Net after 2 years | -$5,057 |
| -$2,857 | Net after 3 years | -$6,835 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs Whatsminer M30S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 is more profitable at $-2.61/day compared to $-4.87/day for the Whatsminer M30S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs Whatsminer M30S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M30S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 or Whatsminer M30S?
The Whatsminer M30S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 841). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan AvalonMiner 841 and Whatsminer M30S?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 runs at 94.9 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 56.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (94.9 vs 38.0 J/TH).