Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Whatsminer M63
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 | Specification | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 360.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 7,200 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,566 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Whatsminer M63
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M63 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 177% more hashrate (130 vs 360 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M63's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 and Whatsminer M63 sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M63 177% more hashrate (130 vs 360 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 55% better power draw (3,250 vs 7,200 W)
- Whatsminer M63 20% better efficiency (25.0 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 53% better weight (13.0 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M63 122% more heat output (11,089 vs 24,566 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63 100% more home mining score (22.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 | Metric | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $11,000 |
| -$3.19 | Daily net profit | -$4.53 |
| -$1,865 | Net after 1 year | -$12,652 |
| -$3,031 | Net after 2 years | -$14,304 |
| -$4,197 | Net after 3 years | -$15,957 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6320.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 or the Whatsminer M63?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 is more profitable at $-3.19/day compared to $-4.53/day for the Whatsminer M63. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Whatsminer M63: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M63 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 or Whatsminer M63?
The Whatsminer M63 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Whatsminer M63: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63 runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficiency (25.0 vs 20.0 J/TH).