Bitaxe Ultra vs Whatsminer M30S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Ultra | Specification | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Ultra
Whatsminer M30S+
Based on BTC price of $79,090 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Ultra comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,400.0 W) in the Bitaxe Ultra's favour. The Whatsminer M30S+ holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitaxe Ultra and Whatsminer M30S+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M30S+ 19900% more hashrate (0.5 vs 100.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Ultra 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,400.0 W)
- Bitaxe Ultra 12% better efficiency (30.0 vs 34.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Ultra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Ultra 97% better weight (0.3 vs 11.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 22558% more heat output (51.2 vs 11,600.8 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Ultra 94% more home mining score (70.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitaxe Ultra | Metric | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$4.52 |
| -$85 | Net after 1 year | -$3,450 |
| -$92 | Net after 2 years | -$5,100 |
| -$98 | Net after 3 years | -$6,750 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe UltraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Ultra30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitaxe Ultra vs Whatsminer M30S+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-4.52/day for the Whatsminer M30S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitaxe Ultra or the Whatsminer M30S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Whatsminer M30S+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitaxe Ultra or Whatsminer M30S+?
The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M30S+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitaxe Ultra vs Whatsminer M30S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S+ runs at 34.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (30.0 vs 34.0 J/TH).