iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs Goldshell KD6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Specification | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 32.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 25.3 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,300 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 90.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 12,200.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,848 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
Goldshell KD6-SE
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell KD6-SE wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 28% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,300 W). The iBeLink BM-K1 Max claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and Goldshell KD6-SE sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 26% more hashrate (32.0 vs 25.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 28% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,300 W)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 9% better efficiency (100.0 vs 90.9 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 30% better weight (12,200 vs 8,500 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 39% more heat output (10,918 vs 7,848 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 18% more home mining score (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Metric | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,250 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,016 |
| -$6.53 | Daily net profit | -$4.61 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 1 year | -$2,698 |
| -$6,015 | Net after 2 years | -$4,381 |
| -$8,398 | Net after 3 years | -$6,063 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD6-SEScore: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD6-SE90.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or Goldshell KD6-SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD6-SE is more profitable at $-4.61/day compared to $-6.53/day for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or Goldshell KD6-SE?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs Goldshell KD6-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KD6-SE scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and Goldshell KD6-SE on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6-SE runs at 90.9 J/TH — a difference of 9.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (100.0 vs 90.9 J/TH).