Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink BM-N1

iBeLink BM-N1

Hashrate 6.6 TH/s Power 2,400 W Efficiency 363.6 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1

Todek Toddminer C1

Hashrate 1.6 TH/s Power 1,380 W Efficiency 890.3 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N1 vs Todek Toddminer C1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N1 Specification Todek Toddminer C1
6.6 TH/s Hashrate 1.6 TH/s
2,400 W Power Consumption 1,380 W
363.6 J/TH Efficiency 890.3 J/TH
Noise Level
9,900.0 kg Weight 4,600.0 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,709 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
iBeLink Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N1

Daily Revenue 0.00000304 BTC $0.24
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.52
Monthly -$165.68
Yearly -$2,015.73

Todek Toddminer C1

Daily Revenue 0.00000071 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$3.31
Daily Profit -$3.26
Monthly -$97.69
Yearly -$1,188.53

Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink BM-N1 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 326% more hashrate (6.6 vs 1.6 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N1's favour. The Todek Toddminer C1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink BM-N1 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-N1 and Todek Toddminer C1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • iBeLink BM-N1 326% more hashrate (6.6 vs 1.6 TH/s)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 43% better power draw (2,400 vs 1,380 W)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 59% better efficiency (364 vs 890 J/TH)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 54% better weight (9,900 vs 4,600 kg)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 74% more heat output (8,189 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 19% more home mining score (26.0 vs 31.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Todek Toddminer C1

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-N1

363.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iBeLink BM-N1 or Todek Toddminer C1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Todek Toddminer C1 is more profitable at $-3.26/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iBeLink BM-N1 vs Todek Toddminer C1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N1 or the Todek Toddminer C1?

The Todek Toddminer C1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iBeLink BM-N1 vs Todek Toddminer C1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 runs at 890.3 J/TH — a difference of 526.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficiency (364 vs 890 J/TH).