iBeLink BM-N3 vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 132.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-N3, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 297% more hashrate (25.0 vs 6.3 TH/s). The Goldshell CK Lite holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-N3 and Goldshell CK Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-N3 297% more hashrate (25.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Lite 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 31% better efficiency (132 vs 190 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 175% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Lite 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $980 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$7.02 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$3,542 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$6,105 | Net after 2 years | -$2,685 |
| -$8,667 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3132.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N3 or the Goldshell CK Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Lite is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-7.02/day for the iBeLink BM-N3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-N3 vs Goldshell CK Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N3 or Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell CK Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N3 and Goldshell CK Lite?
The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 58.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficiency (132 vs 190 J/TH).