Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell CK-BOX

Goldshell CK-BOX

Hashrate 1.1 TH/s Power 215 W Efficiency 204.8 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1

Todek Toddminer C1

Hashrate 1.6 TH/s Power 1,380 W Efficiency 890.3 J/TH

Goldshell CK-BOX vs Todek Toddminer C1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell CK-BOX Specification Todek Toddminer C1
1.1 TH/s Hashrate 1.6 TH/s
215 W Power Consumption 1,380 W
204.8 J/TH Efficiency 890.3 J/TH
Noise Level
2,000.0 kg Weight 4,600.0 kg
734 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,709 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
Goldshell Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell CK-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000048 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.52
Daily Profit -$0.48
Monthly -$14.35
Yearly -$174.54

Todek Toddminer C1

Daily Revenue 0.00000071 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$3.31
Daily Profit -$3.26
Monthly -$97.69
Yearly -$1,188.51

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK-BOX edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption). The standout gap is 84% better power draw (215 vs 1,380 W) in the Goldshell CK-BOX's favour. The Todek Toddminer C1 holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell CK-BOX — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell CK-BOX and Todek Toddminer C1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Todek Toddminer C1 48% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.6 TH/s)
  • Goldshell CK-BOX 84% better power draw (215 vs 1,380 W)
  • Goldshell CK-BOX 77% better efficiency (205 vs 890 J/TH)
  • Goldshell CK-BOX 57% better weight (2,000 vs 4,600 kg)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 542% more heat output (734 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell CK-BOX Metric Todek Toddminer C1
$190 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.48 Daily net profit -$3.26
-$365 Net after 1 year -$1,189
-$539 Net after 2 years -$2,377
-$714 Net after 3 years -$3,566
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell CK-BOX

204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell CK-BOX vs Todek Toddminer C1: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-3.26/day for the Todek Toddminer C1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Todek Toddminer C1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Todek Toddminer C1?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Goldshell CK-BOX vs Todek Toddminer C1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 runs at 890.3 J/TH — a difference of 685.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (205 vs 890 J/TH).