Goldshell CK6 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK6 | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 19.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| 171.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK6
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 91% better power draw (3,300 vs 295 W). The Goldshell CK6 holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell CK6 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK6 972% more hashrate (19.3 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 91% better power draw (3,300 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 4% better efficiency (171 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 1019% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 55% more home mining score (22.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK6 | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$7.22 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$3,436 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$6,073 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$8,710 | Net after 3 years | -$942 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK6 or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-7.22/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK6 or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK6 or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK6 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 7.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficiency (171 vs 164 J/TH).