Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Hashrate 2.4 TH/s Power 1,000 W Efficiency 416.7 J/TH
VS
StrongU STU-U1

StrongU STU-U1

Hashrate 11.0 TH/s Power 1,600 W Efficiency 145.5 J/TH

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster vs StrongU STU-U1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster Specification StrongU STU-U1
2.4 TH/s Hashrate 11.0 TH/s
1,000 W Power Consumption 1,600 W
416.7 J/TH Efficiency 145.5 J/TH
Noise Level
3,600.0 kg Weight 6,500.0 kg
3,412 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,459 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm Blake256r14
Innosilicon Manufacturer StrongU

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000110 BTC $0.09
Daily Electricity -$2.40
Daily Profit -$2.31
Monthly -$69.41
Yearly -$844.46

StrongU STU-U1

Daily Revenue 0.00000506 BTC $0.40
Daily Electricity -$3.84
Daily Profit -$3.44
Monthly -$103.32
Yearly -$1,257.05

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the StrongU STU-U1 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 358% more hashrate (2.4 vs 11.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: StrongU STU-U1 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster and StrongU STU-U1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • StrongU STU-U1 358% more hashrate (2.4 vs 11.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster 38% better power draw (1,000 vs 1,600 W)
  • StrongU STU-U1 65% better efficiency (417 vs 145 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster 45% better weight (3,600 vs 6,500 kg)
  • StrongU STU-U1 60% more heat output (3,412 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster 11% more home mining score (31.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

StrongU STU-U1

145.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster or the StrongU STU-U1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster is more profitable at $-2.31/day compared to $-3.44/day for the StrongU STU-U1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster or the StrongU STU-U1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster or StrongU STU-U1?

The Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the StrongU STU-U1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster vs StrongU STU-U1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster runs at 416.7 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U1 runs at 145.5 J/TH — a difference of 271.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficiency (417 vs 145 J/TH).