iBeLink DM11G vs Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink DM11G | Specification | Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 GH/s | Hashrate | 600.0 MH/s |
| 810 W | Power Consumption | 192 W |
| 75,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 320,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 19,000.0 kg | Weight | 1,720.0 kg |
| 2,764 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 655 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink DM11G
Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink DM11G comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 1700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink DM11G and Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink DM11G 1700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner 76% better power draw (810 vs 192 W)
- iBeLink DM11G 77% better efficiency (75,000 vs 320,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner 91% better weight (19,000 vs 1,720 kg)
- iBeLink DM11G 322% more heat output (2,764 vs 655 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner 18% more home mining score (28.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink DM11G | Metric | Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$1.94 | Daily net profit | -$0.46 |
| -$709 | Net after 1 year | -$1,168 |
| -$1,419 | Net after 2 years | -$1,336 |
| -$2,128 | Net after 3 years | -$1,505 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Quadruple Mini MinerScore: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink DM11G75,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink DM11G or Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner is more profitable at $-0.46/day compared to $-1.94/day for the iBeLink DM11G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink DM11G or the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink DM11G or the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner?
The Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM11G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink DM11G and Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner on J/TH?
The iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner runs at 320,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 245,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (75,000 vs 320,000 J/TH).