iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink DM11G
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Specification | iBeLink DM11G |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.8 GH/s |
| 835 W | Power Consumption | 810 W |
| 157.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 75,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 19,000.0 kg |
| 2,849 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,764 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | X11 |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1
iBeLink DM11G
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-K1 edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 48974% more hashrate (5.3 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-K1's favour. The iBeLink DM11G claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink DM11G diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-K1 48974% more hashrate (5.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink DM11G 3% better power draw (835 vs 810 W)
- iBeLink BM-K1 100% better efficiency (158 vs 75,000 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K1 65% better weight (6,600 vs 19,000 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 3% more heat output (2,849 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Metric | iBeLink DM11G |
|---|---|---|
| $9,855 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.81 | Daily net profit | -$1.94 |
| -$10,517 | Net after 1 year | -$709 |
| -$11,179 | Net after 2 years | -$1,419 |
| -$11,841 | Net after 3 years | -$2,128 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K1157.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-K1 or the iBeLink DM11G?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K1 is more profitable at $-1.81/day compared to $-1.94/day for the iBeLink DM11G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink DM11G: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K1 or iBeLink DM11G?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink DM11G?
The iBeLink BM-K1 runs at 157.6 J/TH while the iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 74,842.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (158 vs 75,000 J/TH).