Goldshell E-AL1M vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-AL1M | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 TH/s | Hashrate | 38.0 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 1,458 W |
| 409.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-AL1M
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-AL1M edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 11479% more hashrate (4.4 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell E-AL1M's favour. That said, the colengine P2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell E-AL1M and colengine P2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-AL1M 11479% more hashrate (4.4 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- colengine P2 19% better power draw (1,800 vs 1,458 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 99% better efficiency (409 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 23% more heat output (6,142 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- colengine P2 36% more home mining score (28.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-AL1M | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$4.16 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$2,318 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$3,837 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$5,356 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-AL1M or colengine P2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the colengine P2 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-4.16/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell E-AL1M or the colengine P2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The colengine P2 is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell E-AL1M or the colengine P2?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell E-AL1M and colengine P2 on J/TH?
The Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 37,959.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (409 vs 38,368 J/TH).