Goldshell E-KA1M vs IceRiver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| — | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
IceRiver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-KA1M edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 175% more hashrate (5.5 vs 2.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS2 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell E-KA1M and IceRiver KS2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-KA1M 175% more hashrate (5.5 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 33% better power draw (1,800 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 45% better efficiency (327 vs 600 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 23% better noise (50.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 50% more heat output (6,142 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 8% more home mining score (56.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$6,025 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$7,050 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$8,075 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-KA1MScore: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-KA1M or IceRiver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs IceRiver KS2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the IceRiver KS2 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell E-KA1M or the IceRiver KS2?
The Goldshell E-KA1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the IceRiver KS2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs IceRiver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 272.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficiency (327 vs 600 J/TH).