Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.6 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 375.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell E-KA1M wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 244% more hashrate (5.5 vs 1.6 TH/s). The Goldshell KA BOX Pro claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell E-KA1M and Goldshell KA BOX Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 244% more hashrate (5.5 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 67% better power draw (1,800 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 13% better efficiency (327 vs 375 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 9% better noise (50.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 200% more heat output (6,142 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 4% more home mining score (56.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $129 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$1.38 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$634 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$1,138 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$1,643 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell KA BOX Pro at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell E-KA1M or the Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell E-KA1M and Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH — a difference of 47.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (327 vs 375 J/TH).