Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 94% better power draw (1,800 vs 100 W). The Goldshell E-KA1M holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 1275% more hashrate (5.5 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 94% better power draw (1,800 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 24% better efficiency (327 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 30% better noise (50.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 1700% more heat output (6,142 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 27% more home mining score (56.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-KA1M or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell E-KA1M or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-KA1M at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell E-KA1M or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra on J/TH?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 77.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficiency (327 vs 250 J/TH).