Goldshell CK-BOX vs Todek Toddminer C1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | Todek Toddminer C1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.6 TH/s |
| 215 W | Power Consumption | 1,380 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 890.3 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.0 kg | Weight | 4,600.0 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,709 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Todek |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
Todek Toddminer C1
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK-BOX edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 84% better power draw (215 vs 1,380 W) in the Goldshell CK-BOX's favour. The Todek Toddminer C1 claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK-BOX and Todek Toddminer C1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Todek Toddminer C1 48% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 84% better power draw (215 vs 1,380 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 77% better efficiency (205 vs 890 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better weight (2.0 vs 4,600.0 kg)
- Todek Toddminer C1 542% more heat output (734 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 90% more home mining score (59.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | Todek Toddminer C1 |
|---|---|---|
| $399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.48 | Daily net profit | -$3.26 |
| -$574 | Net after 1 year | -$1,189 |
| -$748 | Net after 2 years | -$2,377 |
| -$923 | Net after 3 years | -$3,566 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK-BOX or the Todek Toddminer C1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-3.26/day for the Todek Toddminer C1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Todek Toddminer C1?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Todek Toddminer C1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell CK-BOX or the Todek Toddminer C1?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Todek Toddminer C1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell CK-BOX and Todek Toddminer C1?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 runs at 890.3 J/TH — a difference of 685.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (205 vs 890 J/TH).