Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Holic H28

Holic H28

Hashrate 28.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 75.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M53S+

Whatsminer M53S+

Hashrate 302.0 TH/s Power 7,248 W Efficiency 24.0 J/TH

Holic H28 vs Whatsminer M53S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Holic H28 Specification Whatsminer M53S+
28.0 TH/s Hashrate 302.0 TH/s
2,100 W Power Consumption 7,248 W
75.0 J/TH Efficiency 24.0 J/TH
Noise Level 50 dB
Weight 27.5 kg
7,165 BTU/hr BTU Output 24,730 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Holic Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Holic H28

Daily Revenue 0.00001289 BTC $0.99
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.05
Monthly -$121.44
Yearly -$1,477.55

Whatsminer M53S+

Daily Revenue 0.00013898 BTC $10.70
Daily Electricity -$17.40
Daily Profit -$6.70
Monthly -$200.90
Yearly -$2,444.26

Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M53S+ comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 979% more hashrate (28.0 vs 302.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M53S+'s favour. The Holic H28 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M53S+ — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Holic H28 and Whatsminer M53S+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M53S+ 979% more hashrate (28.0 vs 302.0 TH/s)
  • Holic H28 71% better power draw (2,100 vs 7,248 W)
  • Whatsminer M53S+ 68% better efficiency (75.0 vs 24.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M53S+ 245% more heat output (7,165 vs 24,730 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M53S+ 69% more home mining score (26.0 vs 44.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Holic H28 Metric Whatsminer M53S+
Upfront cost (MSRP) $10,000
-$4.05 Daily net profit -$6.70
-$1,478 Net after 1 year -$12,444
-$2,955 Net after 2 years -$14,889
-$4,433 Net after 3 years -$17,333
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M53S+

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M53S+

24.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Holic H28 vs Whatsminer M53S+: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Holic H28 is more profitable at $-4.05/day compared to $-6.70/day for the Whatsminer M53S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Holic H28 or Whatsminer M53S+?

The Whatsminer M53S+ is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Holic H28 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Holic H28 or the Whatsminer M53S+?

The Whatsminer M53S+ scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Holic H28). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Holic H28 and Whatsminer M53S+?

The Holic H28 runs at 75.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M53S+ runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 51.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficiency (75.0 vs 24.0 J/TH).