IceRiver AL0 vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 38.0 GH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 1,458 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the colengine P2 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 9400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the colengine P2's favour. That said, the IceRiver AL0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver AL0 and colengine P2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- colengine P2 9400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 93% better power draw (100 vs 1,458 W)
- colengine P2 85% better efficiency (250,000 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 88% better noise (10.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.8 kg)
- colengine P2 1358% more heat output (341 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 87% more home mining score (71.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
colengine P238,368.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver AL0 or colengine P2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-3.50/day for the colengine P2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver AL0 vs colengine P2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the colengine P2 at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver AL0 vs colengine P2: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 38/100 for the colengine P2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver AL0 and colengine P2?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 211,631.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (250,000 vs 38,368 J/TH).