IceRiver KS0 Pro vs SuperScalar K10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Specification | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 45.0 GH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 1,845 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 41,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 8.3 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,295 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | SuperScalar |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0 Pro
SuperScalar K10
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS0 Pro comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 99% better efficiency (500 vs 41,000 J/TH) in the IceRiver KS0 Pro's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS0 Pro and SuperScalar K10 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 344% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 95% better power draw (100 vs 1,845 W)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 99% better efficiency (500 vs 41,000 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 70% better weight (2.5 vs 8.3 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 1745% more heat output (341 vs 6,295 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 154% more home mining score (71.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Metric | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,200 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$4.43 |
| -$284 | Net after 1 year | -$6,816 |
| -$369 | Net after 2 years | -$8,431 |
| -$454 | Net after 3 years | -$10,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS0 Pro or SuperScalar K10 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs SuperScalar K10: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS0 Pro or SuperScalar K10?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS0 Pro and SuperScalar K10?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (500 vs 41,000 J/TH).