Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver AL3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 7400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.2 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 Pro claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS0 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 7400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver AL3 53% better efficiency (233 vs 500 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more home mining score (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$284 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$369 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$454 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS0 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS0 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS0 Pro?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 266.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (233 vs 500 J/TH).