Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
IceRiver KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS0 Pro edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 500 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 27678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 92% better power draw (1,300 vs 100 W)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 500 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 42% better noise (60.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 84% better weight (15.5 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 1200% more heat output (4,436 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 37% more home mining score (52.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$284 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$369 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$454 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS0 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS0 Pro?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver AE2 720Mh at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS0 Pro?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,055.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 500 J/TH).