IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0 Pro
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS0 Pro edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W). The Iceriver KS3M claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS3M 2900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 12% better efficiency (500 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 85% better weight (2.5 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$284 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$369 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$454 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS3M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS0 Pro or the Iceriver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 66.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (500 vs 567 J/TH).