IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.2 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 85% better power draw (3,400 vs 500 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite's favour. That said, the IceRiver KS3M isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS3M and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3M 43% more hashrate (6.0 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 85% better power draw (3,400 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 79% better efficiency (567 vs 119 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% better weight (14.4 vs 4.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 580% more heat output (11,601 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$14,300 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$17,200 | Net after 3 years | -$1,848 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3M or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3M and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 447.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (567 vs 119 J/TH).