Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| 2,000.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.1 GH/s |
| 2,500 W | Power Consumption | 520 W |
| 1,250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 253,658.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 22.0 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 8,530 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,774 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-Q pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 80% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 253,659 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A11 Pro and Jasminer X16-Q pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 2% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 79% better power draw (2,500 vs 520 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 80% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 253,659 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 55% better weight (22.0 vs 10.0 kg)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 381% more heat output (8,530 vs 1,774 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 63% more home mining score (40.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| $4,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,249 |
| -$6.00 | Daily net profit | -$1.25 |
| -$6,190 | Net after 1 year | -$1,704 |
| -$8,380 | Net after 2 years | -$2,160 |
| -$10,570 | Net after 3 years | -$2,615 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-Q proScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q pro253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q pro is more profitable at $-1.25/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro and Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH — a difference of 996,341.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 253,659 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster