Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| 137.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 3 W | Power Consumption | 2,145 W |
| 18.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 8,550.0 kg |
| 9 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,319 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Intel | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Based on BTC price of $77,884 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 2,145.0 W). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 holds the edge in hashrate and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 23988% more hashrate (0.1 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 2,145.0 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 72% better efficiency (18.3 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 86002% more heat output (8.5 vs 7,318.7 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$0.00 | Daily net profit | -$3.97 |
| -$0 | Net after 1 year | -$3,947 |
| -$1 | Net after 2 years | -$5,395 |
| -$1 | Net after 3 years | -$6,842 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M10Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or MicroBT Whatsminer M10 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.97/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 on J/TH?
The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 46.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficiency (18.3 vs 65.0 J/TH).